<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Aeropause Games - Latest Comments in Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft: Who Ranks Better?</title><link>http://aeropausegames.disqus.com/</link><description>Aeropause is an exploration in gaming culture, trends, technologies and  innovations.</description><atom:link href="https://aeropausegames.disqus.com/nintendo_sony_microsoft_who_ranks_better/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 14:17:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft: Who Ranks Better?</title><link>http://www.aeropause.com/2006/08/nintendo-sony-microsoft-who-ranks-better/#comment-6342034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;jacobson there has only been three copanys on top nintendo atari and the reigning champ sony.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">red</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 14:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft: Who Ranks Better?</title><link>http://www.aeropause.com/2006/08/nintendo-sony-microsoft-who-ranks-better/#comment-6342033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's so cut-throat. One company could be on top for a short while then someone else is. I liken this industry to actors: Who's the best right now, show me what you got!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft: Who Ranks Better?</title><link>http://www.aeropause.com/2006/08/nintendo-sony-microsoft-who-ranks-better/#comment-6342032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i agree with red the wii is just a gimmick. if you want motion sensing just get an eyetoy. its actualy a little bit cooler sense it puts you on the screen but it doesnt take long before you get tired of moving around. it is a good workout though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JR</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:41:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft: Who Ranks Better?</title><link>http://www.aeropause.com/2006/08/nintendo-sony-microsoft-who-ranks-better/#comment-6342031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sony thrashes ms and nintendo when it comes to homeconsoles and has taken about 42 percent of the handheld market from nintendos once 98 in little over a year. sony will likely dominate with the ps3. xbox is dead in japan and is selling worse than the dreamcast was at this point in its lifetime everywhere else. and nintendo lost all its massmarket home console credability with gaycube. its going to be hard for the average consumer to pay 250 for a GAYCUBE WITH A GIMICKY CONTROLLER THAT STILL CANT PLAY DVD MOVIES.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RED</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft: Who Ranks Better?</title><link>http://www.aeropause.com/2006/08/nintendo-sony-microsoft-who-ranks-better/#comment-6342030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nintendo will always be the best video game makers. Everyone else stands on their shoulders!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BiGBertha</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>